<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Real Page Turner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.zincroe.com/2008/04/a-real-page-turner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.zincroe.com/2008/04/a-real-page-turner/</link>
	<description>Ramblings from the team at zinc Roe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://blog.zincroe.com/2008/04/a-real-page-turner/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.zincroe.com/?p=3#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I took a quick look through DjVu, and it says the file format is open. AS3 has low-level access to binary data (thought the ByteArray class), so we could (in theory) write a decoder in AS3 to load and parse the files directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a quick look through DjVu, and it says the file format is open. AS3 has low-level access to binary data (thought the ByteArray class), so we could (in theory) write a decoder in AS3 to load and parse the files directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davin</title>
		<link>http://blog.zincroe.com/2008/04/a-real-page-turner/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Davin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.zincroe.com/?p=3#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll just keep commenting on my own post...
Wired Magazine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/multimedia/2008/03/gallery_internet_archive&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;took a look&lt;/a&gt; at the Internet Archive&#039;s custom Scribe scanning stations. There&#039;s also a &lt;a href=&quot;http://redjar.org/jared/blog/archives/2006/02/10/more-details-on-open-archives-scribe-book-scanner-project/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2006 post from Jared Benedict&lt;/a&gt; that talks in a bit more detail about the &quot;scanning&quot; set-up. The Scribe (to which, it seems, the Atiz systems owe some of their design) are essentially dual-camera copy stands using fairly high-end digital SLR camera equipment.

I&#039;ve also been wondering, in terms of our own goals of building an archival document builder/viewer, whether it makes sense to try and work with an existing document collection format like &lt;a href=&quot;http://djvu.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DjVu&lt;/a&gt; or whether that would add a lot more overhead? Because we are intending to work with Flash, there would need to be some server processing layer to pull images out of the DjVu archive on the fly so it might make more sense just to store the images in a ZIP archive. I know not of these things so I am just theorizing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just keep commenting on my own post&#8230;<br />
Wired Magazine <a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/multimedia/2008/03/gallery_internet_archive" rel="nofollow">took a look</a> at the Internet Archive&#8217;s custom Scribe scanning stations. There&#8217;s also a <a href="http://redjar.org/jared/blog/archives/2006/02/10/more-details-on-open-archives-scribe-book-scanner-project/" rel="nofollow">2006 post from Jared Benedict</a> that talks in a bit more detail about the &#8220;scanning&#8221; set-up. The Scribe (to which, it seems, the Atiz systems owe some of their design) are essentially dual-camera copy stands using fairly high-end digital SLR camera equipment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been wondering, in terms of our own goals of building an archival document builder/viewer, whether it makes sense to try and work with an existing document collection format like <a href="http://djvu.org/" rel="nofollow">DjVu</a> or whether that would add a lot more overhead? Because we are intending to work with Flash, there would need to be some server processing layer to pull images out of the DjVu archive on the fly so it might make more sense just to store the images in a ZIP archive. I know not of these things so I am just theorizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davin</title>
		<link>http://blog.zincroe.com/2008/04/a-real-page-turner/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Davin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.zincroe.com/?p=3#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also wondering how institutions are scanning books for archives and more active public display? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://booksnap.atiz.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BookSnap&lt;/a&gt; system by Atiz seems like a great option but it&#039;s also not a small investment for smaller libraries and museums.

A lot of what I&#039;ve seen as far as raw digitized material has been from flatbed scanners or from a digital photo copy stand. The quality has been mixed and gutter shadows and colour balance across spreads are the biggest issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also wondering how institutions are scanning books for archives and more active public display? The <a href="http://booksnap.atiz.com/" rel="nofollow">BookSnap</a> system by Atiz seems like a great option but it&#8217;s also not a small investment for smaller libraries and museums.</p>
<p>A lot of what I&#8217;ve seen as far as raw digitized material has been from flatbed scanners or from a digital photo copy stand. The quality has been mixed and gutter shadows and colour balance across spreads are the biggest issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

